Editorial policy
Sources and verification
The casino24.pro editorial policy guides the work of the disgusting digital team. We prioritise regulators, provider documentation and official publications. A third-party news report may point to a topic, but it does not replace consulting the document that supports a claim.
We check quotations in their original context. Numbers need a source, date and unit, along with any conditions affecting their interpretation. For games with different versions, we do not treat one RTP as applying to every offering. When sources disagree or do not support a conclusion, we state that limitation.
From question to publication
Each article starts with an outline based on the reader’s question: what needs explaining, which sources to consult and which questions to answer. Review checks topic coverage, calculations, links and consistency between the title and content.
A draft containing an error, unsupported passage or incomplete explanation goes back for rewriting. Publication follows approval in that review. If a claim cannot be supported, it is removed or accompanied by the relevant limitation. We do not fill gaps with invented personal experiences.
Corrections and contact
To request a correction, send the URL, the passage in question and a source, if available, to contato@casino24.pro. Our target is an initial response within five working days. If verification takes longer, we will explain its progress; this target does not mean every investigation ends within five days.
Confirmed errors are corrected. Changes affecting meaning, an important number or a conclusion should carry a note on the page stating the date and what changed. Context updates should not erase the record of an earlier correction.
Commercial interests
The site currently has no affiliate links. If that changes, the commercial relationship will be disclosed alongside the link and this policy will be updated. A commission must not buy a conclusion, hide a limitation or bypass source verification.
Commercial proposals and story suggestions follow the same research criteria. Readers should be able to distinguish editorial information from advertising. Mentioning a brand is not a recommendation or proof that it is authorised to operate where the reader lives.
Responsibility and bylines
We do not promise winnings or present betting as income. Content should explain risks and point to the responsible gambling page when the subject calls for information on limits or help. The site is for adults aged 18 and over.
Editorial bylines identified as pen names belong to the disgusting digital team and organise coverage by subject area. The Team page explains this model. When a real author takes over a byline, the profile is updated. Using a pen name does not remove the duty to review work or correct errors.