How we work
We use AI to collect sources, prepare drafts and check them against the evidence. The publisher is responsible for the content. Disclosed team pen names do not imply personal testing.
The path every page takes
Evidence first
We collect provider documentation, official registers and dated sources. A personal test is evidence only when a record of that test exists.
AI draft
The AI organises the collected facts into a draft — and only the collected facts: any claim without a source in the dossier is rejected automatically.
Fact checking
Checks compare claims, dates, numbers and links with the collected sources. We do not describe playing, deposits or withdrawals as personal experiences without documentation.
Review and publication
A separate review checks evidence and coverage before publication. Automated checks do not establish that a person tested the product. Gaps and uncertainty must remain explicit.
Our fixed rules
- A real-money page only with dated evidence. Deposit and withdrawal logs, screenshots, a chat with support — or it does not ship.
- No promise of winnings, ever. No "paying hour", no "glitched game", no "signal". When a myth has search demand, we answer with data — we do not endorse it.
- Disclosed team pen names organise the coverage. Profiles must not invent qualifications, biographies or a history of personal tests.
- We err in public. Corrections stay logged on the page itself, with the date and what changed.
- Affiliate links are currently disabled. Any future commercial link requires a separate check of authorisation and eligibility for the reader’s jurisdiction, with a clear disclosure.
Country documentary index (casino24 score)
The casino24 score is a documentary index computed by code, separately for each country, and shown only on that country’s page. It adds up five criteria with fixed weights, and every point requires a primary source with a verbatim quote and a date, re-checked when the index is computed; anything not publicly documented scores zero and is shown as “not publicly documented”.
Only documentation for the operation in the country or for the brand’s own global service counts — and the global service counts only when it is anchored by a regulator-confirmed licence or an identified legal entity — never that of a group company in another country. Third-party review sites do not count in this version. In the country tables, brands are grouped by regulatory status first and only then by score.
The score does not measure quality or user experience — we made no deposits, withdrawals or tests — and it is not a recommendation nor a sign that the offer is permitted: in Brazil, Provisional Measure 1,394 has banned offering bets since 25 Sep 2026.
| Criterion | Weight | Scale for Brazil (0–10) |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory status in the country | 30 | active authorization 10; on the SPA/MF register with the authorization ended by Provisional Measure 1,394: 6; not on the register, status not confirmed or brand on an official block list: 0 |
| Corporate transparency | 15 | legal entity 3, CNPJ 3, official domain stated by an official source 2, readable, dated terms and conditions 2 |
| Licences outside the country | 10 | licences a regulator confirms as active: none 0, one 6, two or more 10 |
| Documented payments | 20 | public help centre documents payment methods 4, a minimum or maximum amount 3, processing times 3 |
| Support and player protection | 25 | live chat 3, e-mail or phone 2, ombudsman or complaints channel 2; deposit or loss limits, self-exclusion and time-out: 1 each |
Score = sum of weight × criterion ÷ 100, from 0 to 10, one decimal (0.05 rounds up). We recalculate when the brand’s data or sources change and at least every quarter.
What the score does not claim
- It does not rate quality, withdrawal speed or actual support.
- It does not use reputation on complaint sites in this version.
- It neither authorizes nor encourages betting; we publish no access links, promo codes or instructions to get around blocks.